Reasoning from inconsistency: a field exploration
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5334/pb-45-1-1Abstract
This issue has proceeded from the Fifth International Conference on Thinking, which was held in the Department of Psychology of the University of Leuven, Belgium, July 22-24, 2004. The conference, which was sponsored by the Fund for Scientific Research Flanders and the British Psychological Society (Cognitive Section), intended to bring together researchers working in different domains of the psychology of thinking and reasoning. Five keynote speakers (Ruth Byrne, Vinod Goel, Karl-Christoph Klauer, Paolo Legrenzi, & Douglas Medin) were introducing some of the important topics (the rational imagination, the neuropsychology of reasoning, the Wason selection task, reasoning to consistency, biological thought within and across cultures).Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2005 The Author(s)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms. If a submission is rejected or withdrawn prior to publication, all rights return to the author(s):
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Submitting to the journal implicitly confirms that all named authors and rights holders have agreed to the above terms of publication. It is the submitting author's responsibility to ensure all authors and relevant institutional bodies have given their agreement at the point of submission.
Note: some institutions require authors to seek written approval in relation to the terms of publication. Should this be required, authors can request a separate licence agreement document from the editorial team (e.g. authors who are Crown employees).